Size vs. Size on disk refers to the apparent paradox where the “disk” value for a file or folder is larger than its actual “size.” Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for managing storage space and optimizing system performance.
In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore the reasons behind the disparity, provide practical tips for troubleshooting, and uncover the intricacies of this topic.
Image: www.partitionwizard.jp
The Underlying Factors of Size Discrepancies
When dealing with files, we encounter two key terms:
Size: Denotes the actual amount of data stored in the file. It’s typically measured in bytes, KiB (Kilobytes), MiB (Megabytes), and so on.
Size on disk: Represents the amount of storage allocated to the file on the hard drive. It usually includes the data itself, metadata (file attributes and information), and additional space for file system overhead (e.g., indices and block padding).
The primary factor causing the “Size on disk” value to be larger is the way file systems manage storage. Most modern file systems use clusters to allocate disk space. A cluster is a group of sectors on the hard disk that functions as the smallest unit of data allocation. When a file is saved, it’s assigned a certain number of clusters, depending on the file size.
Consider a file with a size of 100 bytes. If each cluster has a size of 4 KiB, the file will occupy a single cluster. However, the “Size on disk” will be reported as 4 KiB, even though the actual data only takes up a fraction of that space.
Image: android.stackexchange.com
Size Vs Size On Disk How To Fix
Exploring Troub.